<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for booshink</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booshink.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booshink.com</link>
	<description>Exploring what&#039;s possible with punctuation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Grief by Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/grief/comment-page-1/#comment-2840</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booshink.com/?p=273#comment-2840</guid>
		<description>...and not just some dog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and not just some dog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stuff by Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booshink.com/?p=248#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>We gotta have our stuff, don&#039;t we? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We gotta have our stuff, don&#8217;t we? <img src='http://www.booshink.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grammar Rules Part 2 &#8211; I and Me by the editor</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/grammar-rules-part-2-i-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>the editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booshink.com/2008/03/23/grammar-rules-part-2-i-and-me/#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. To answer your question, in this case &quot;you and I&quot; is correct and is ALWAYS correct in this usage. The reason is that &quot;you and I&quot; is the subject of the sentence and you should always use the subjective form &quot;I&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. To answer your question, in this case &#8220;you and I&#8221; is correct and is ALWAYS correct in this usage. The reason is that &#8220;you and I&#8221; is the subject of the sentence and you should always use the subjective form &#8220;I&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grammar Rules Part 2 &#8211; I and Me by Jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/grammar-rules-part-2-i-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 01:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booshink.com/2008/03/23/grammar-rules-part-2-i-and-me/#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post. As an Asian who grew up in America, I made English grammar a priority in my education, but I believe my English teachers may have got some of it wrong as well, including this incorrect &quot;between you and I&quot; phrase. Now, I&#039;m trying to learn the right format for these often used phrases. I still have trouble remembering the technical explanations, but I&#039;ll study it until it sinks in. 

I can&#039;t yet explain why but I believe:

&quot;You and I are just as incorrigible&quot; is correct form whereas &quot;You and me are just as incorrigible&quot; is incorrect. 

Am I right, and what is the technical explanation for this? Sometimes either one can be correct, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post. As an Asian who grew up in America, I made English grammar a priority in my education, but I believe my English teachers may have got some of it wrong as well, including this incorrect &#8220;between you and I&#8221; phrase. Now, I&#8217;m trying to learn the right format for these often used phrases. I still have trouble remembering the technical explanations, but I&#8217;ll study it until it sinks in. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t yet explain why but I believe:</p>
<p>&#8220;You and I are just as incorrigible&#8221; is correct form whereas &#8220;You and me are just as incorrigible&#8221; is incorrect. </p>
<p>Am I right, and what is the technical explanation for this? Sometimes either one can be correct, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sparky&#8217;s Doesn&#8217;t Got It All by Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/sparkys-doesnt-got-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-2505</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booshink.com/?p=245#comment-2505</guid>
		<description>Sparky&#039;s is usually good place to get a bottled water and take a restroom break....... but that&#039;s about it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sparky&#8217;s is usually good place to get a bottled water and take a restroom break&#8230;&#8230;. but that&#8217;s about it. <img src='http://www.booshink.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Pics by Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/random-pics-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booshink.com/random-pics-3/#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>That picture of Izzy and the kittie is amazing. Nice shots Dad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That picture of Izzy and the kittie is amazing. Nice shots Dad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Link Too Many by Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/a-link-too-many/comment-page-1/#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booshink.com/?p=192#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>The hula girl DEFINITELY stays.  Was there really ever any question?
When you coming by again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hula girl DEFINITELY stays.  Was there really ever any question?<br />
When you coming by again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Migrating Wordpress by Karcheg</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/migrating-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-2299</link>
		<dc:creator>Karcheg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booshink.com/?p=157#comment-2299</guid>
		<description>Hmm, very cognitive post. 
Is this theme good unough for the Digg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, very cognitive post.<br />
Is this theme good unough for the Digg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The End of the World As We Know It by Rick Knausz</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Knausz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booshink.com/?p=167#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>hey, Holroyd.this is Rick from american wax.damn fine article.couldn&#039;t have said it better myself.i was also thinking about our last conversation,and a thought occured to me.as we know,revelations tells us that the &#039;&#039;mark&#039;&#039; will be the # of a man.it will also be 666.now everyone would be on the lookout for such an obvious symbol,however.......what about an identification # with 3 series of 6 digits each [i.e. 123456-789012-345678]!this would be virtually unnoticed! especially if done through a chip where noone even realizes the # of digits involved!IT WOULD ALSO PROVIDE AN ALMOST UNLIMITED SUPPLY OF #&#039;S FOR EVERY MAN ON EARTH!....just a thought.i don&#039;t have e-mail, so if you want to get in touch just use snail mail.325 Payne Pond rd  Westville,S.C. 29175...otherwise i&#039;ll talk to you next trip.keep up the good work and wish your family well for me.c-ya...Rick!  p.s. dont try the e-mail adress given it aint mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, Holroyd.this is Rick from american wax.damn fine article.couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself.i was also thinking about our last conversation,and a thought occured to me.as we know,revelations tells us that the &#8221;mark&#8221; will be the # of a man.it will also be 666.now everyone would be on the lookout for such an obvious symbol,however&#8230;&#8230;.what about an identification # with 3 series of 6 digits each [i.e. 123456-789012-345678]!this would be virtually unnoticed! especially if done through a chip where noone even realizes the # of digits involved!IT WOULD ALSO PROVIDE AN ALMOST UNLIMITED SUPPLY OF #&#8217;S FOR EVERY MAN ON EARTH!&#8230;.just a thought.i don&#8217;t have e-mail, so if you want to get in touch just use snail mail.325 Payne Pond rd  Westville,S.C. 29175&#8230;otherwise i&#8217;ll talk to you next trip.keep up the good work and wish your family well for me.c-ya&#8230;Rick!  p.s. dont try the e-mail adress given it aint mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A New Direction by The Grammarphile</title>
		<link>http://www.booshink.com/a-new-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-2165</link>
		<dc:creator>The Grammarphile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booshink.com/?p=182#comment-2165</guid>
		<description>Good luck!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck!  <img src='http://www.booshink.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
